Title: Rupert Sheldrake
Description: Explore Rupert Sheldrake’s controversial theory of morphic resonance, a radical idea suggesting that memory and form are shaped by collective fields. This in-depth essay examines its scientific, philosophical, and psychological implications, critiques, and potential future in modern science.
Author: Alloya Huckfield
tags:
- Morphic-resonance
- Rupert-Sheldrake
icon: LiAsteriskmorphic-resonance-fields

Rupert Sheldrake’s theory of morphic resonance challenges conventional scientific paradigms by proposing that memory and habits in nature are not solely stored within individual organisms but are instead influenced by collective fields of information. According to Sheldrake, these morphic fields act as a kind of non-material blueprint that shapes the development, behavior, and evolution of species.
First introduced in his 1981 book A New Science of Life: The Hypothesis of Formative Causation, Sheldrake’s theory has been met with both fascination and skepticism. While mainstream science largely dismisses morphic resonance as pseudoscience, proponents argue that it offers a compelling alternative to mechanistic explanations of biological and behavioral phenomena.
This essay explores the foundations of Sheldrake’s theory, its implications for biology, psychology, and physics, the criticisms it has faced, and its potential influence on future scientific thought.
Sheldrake defines morphic fields as organizing patterns that influence the form and behavior of living and non-living systems. These fields are not fixed but evolve over time through a process called morphic resonance, where similar patterns reinforce each other across time and space.
Sheldrake’s ideas draw from several historical and philosophical traditions:
Traditional biology explains form and behavior through genetics and natural selection. Sheldrake’s theory suggests an additional layer of causation:
Sheldrake extends morphic resonance to cognitive processes:
Morphic resonance intersects with cutting-edge physics: